First Principle of the Natural World

* *

It’s with a certain sense of awe that I introduce a new page on this website, to be devoted to the **Principle of Least Action**. I’ve written about this principle, on this website (see the article here) and elsewhere, in various ways and contexts, but it appears now for the first time as the centerpiece around which writings on this theme will be gathered.

The principle itself, though simple, requires careful statement, before we do that, however, we must pause to take the measure of situation. Even as leading physicists and mathematicians have embraced **Least Action** as the single moving principle of the entire natural world, most others, even at the highest levels of education and professionalism in fields other than mathematics or the physical sciences, regard it as of no interest to themselves, or more likely, have never heard of it all.

The issue is acute: our old conceptions speak of *mechanism*, with even the most subtle of natural bodies composed ultimately of inert parts moved by impressed forces, according to equations knowable only to experts. What a different picture **Least Action** paints! Wholeness is, in truth primary, with causality flowing from whole to part, not from part to whole. Nature is everywhere self-moving, and throughout, life is real. In short, the era of Newton is behind us, and once again, *nature lives*! We cannot know yet, what the consequences of embracing this truth might be: but the time to begin exploring this question is surely now, before we have altogether destroyed this planet–the living system of which we are all organic parts, and on which our lives depend. It’s the mission of this web page to explore the concept of least action, and some of the many ways it may affect our institutions and or lives. Such a trajectory of thought, which I would call *dialectical,* has been the theme of the ongoing blog commentary on *Newton/Maxwwell/Marx. *Between Newton and **Least Action**, we may be living in the acute stress-field* *of a dialectical advance of human understanding.

As a firm mathematical foundation for further discussions of **Least Action**, here is an elegant sequence of steps leading from Newton to **Least Action**, following closely the argument given by Cornelius Lanczos in his *Variational Principles of Mechanics*. I have distinguished seven steps in this argument, adding a few notes by way of commentary.

Note that this does not propose to prove the truth of **Least Action** (though some rugged Newtonians such as Kelvin might take it in this sense!). Rather it demonstrates the formal equivalence of Newton’s laws and the principle of least action. Lanczos points out that the argument is reversible: can be traversed in either direction. The two equations are formally equivalent, but speak of completely different worlds.

We should note that they are not of equal explanatory power. **Least Action** serves as foundation for General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics, areas in which Newton is powerless.

David ShinerTom, the postings on your blog are fascinating, and I’m sorry not to have read them earlier. I always learn by paying attention to what you’re doing. For example, I used Modern Times in my senior-level Integrative Studies course at Shimer this past term, after hearing you opine some years ago that it qualified as a worthy addition to a Great Books curriculum. I’ll let you know if I have particular responses to anything on this site as the summer progresses, time and energy willing.